<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF 
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
>

	<channel rdf:about="http://www.hifi-forums.co.uk/">
	
		<title>Hi-fi Forums: Speakers</title>
		<description>Forum : Speakers : Ask for information and advice about Quad Speakers</description>
	
	<link>http://www.hifi-forums.co.uk/</link>
	
	<items>
		<rdf:Seq>
			
			<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hifi-forums.co.uk/messages.cfm?messageid=C6FC2BBB-3048-8D61-F875B3281ECB4B31&amp;r=1" />
			
			<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hifi-forums.co.uk/messages.cfm?messageid=7F3E0DF9-5070-B652-04BE89C69E5A2D32&amp;r=2" />
			
			<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hifi-forums.co.uk/messages.cfm?messageid=FCA78D77-5070-B652-043C7D6BBE93E670&amp;r=3" />
			
			<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hifi-forums.co.uk/messages.cfm?messageid=4186855A-5070-B652-04C9F941BF129D89&amp;r=4" />
			
		</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	
	</channel>

	
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.hifi-forums.co.uk/messages.cfm?messageid=C6FC2BBB-3048-8D61-F875B3281ECB4B31&amp;r=1">
		<title>Speakers and Quad II</title>
		<description>I have a couple of  old Quad II Amplifer and I need to change speakers. Does the new L22 sounds good with them?Alternatively what is the right stand or even bookshelf speaker?</description>
		<link>http://www.hifi-forums.co.uk/messages.cfm?messageid=C6FC2BBB-3048-8D61-F875B3281ECB4B31&amp;r=1</link>
		<dc:date>2008-03-19T12:20:57--01:00</dc:date>
		<dc:subject>Speakers and Quad II</dc:subject>
		</item>
	
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.hifi-forums.co.uk/messages.cfm?messageid=7F3E0DF9-5070-B652-04BE89C69E5A2D32&amp;r=2">
		<title>Wharfedale vs Quad</title>
		<description>Help, help, help...  I&apos;ll probably get slaughtered for the following, but it&apos;s time for me to get uncomfortable.  I am hardly an audiophile in the technical sense, but definitely enjoy good sound and video.  I need some help understanding something, so please give me your views.I am completing a dedicated cinema / music room of 6.8m x 4.6m (that&apos;s about 22 x 15 ft for the footies). There will be 6 comfortable seats in it.  The screen is 2.1m wide and hangs on cables in front of a full width thick curtain (hiding a french door).  Other than that the room is fairly ordinary with windows at the back fronted by heavy curtains.I run an Onkyo 805 Amp and 504 DVD player (and dare I mention a PS3 BD player as well) and an Optoma H82 projector.  I am looking for new speakers (previously had the Diamond 8 series all round with 8.4s in the front and a 10&quot; powercube).  I will be getting the Onkto HD875 when it releases here (South Africa).I&apos;ve had a look at many speakers, and whilst money is ultimately a consideration, it&apos;s not top of my list.  I&apos;ve wanted a Quad set-up 22L2&apos;s for music and a L-ite package for video (for some reason I can&apos;t get the L-series cinema package here and to buid it up is just not worth it at SA prices).  The reviews have been outstanding.  I was quite happy with my Wharfedales, aside from the finish, but what I&apos;m trying to understand is: what is the real difference between the Quads and the Wharfedales.  It is an ignorant question, I know, but I&apos;ve never seen them together in a shootout and they seem to share much of the same technology but have (at least here in SA) VERY polarised reputations.  An alternative to the Quads would be EVO2&apos;s or possibly the Opus 2&apos;s.  The thing is that the Wharfedales seem to have far more advanced cabinets.  Any views?</description>
		<link>http://www.hifi-forums.co.uk/messages.cfm?messageid=7F3E0DF9-5070-B652-04BE89C69E5A2D32&amp;r=2</link>
		<dc:date>2007-08-19T17:49:06--01:00</dc:date>
		<dc:subject>Wharfedale vs Quad</dc:subject>
		</item>
	
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.hifi-forums.co.uk/messages.cfm?messageid=FCA78D77-5070-B652-043C7D6BBE93E670&amp;r=3">
		<title>Quad 12L Active vs Quad 12L Pro Active</title>
		<description>Apart form the look, is there any difference between Quad 12L Active and Quad 12L Pro Active  ? Amplifier , speaker element ?Are their amplifiers analog or digital ?Pro Active. The link with picture has been removed.Maybe there is no difference between Pro Actve and Active.Activehttp://www.quad-hifi.co.uk/model.php?sector_id=2&amp;range_id=5&amp;model_id=23</description>
		<link>http://www.hifi-forums.co.uk/messages.cfm?messageid=FCA78D77-5070-B652-043C7D6BBE93E670&amp;r=3</link>
		<dc:date>2007-06-05T16:11:18--01:00</dc:date>
		<dc:subject>Quad 12L Active vs Quad 12L Pro Active</dc:subject>
		</item>
	
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.hifi-forums.co.uk/messages.cfm?messageid=4186855A-5070-B652-04C9F941BF129D89&amp;r=4">
		<title>Quad 11L damage</title>
		<description>I have some Quad 11L&apos;s they are great little speakers but recently someone has poked the inside of the cone and the middle part of the bass cone has a dent in it, does anyone know if this will severely effect the sound?Also is there a way i can make the dent pop back out again?  :cry:Hope someone can helpMatt</description>
		<link>http://www.hifi-forums.co.uk/messages.cfm?messageid=4186855A-5070-B652-04C9F941BF129D89&amp;r=4</link>
		<dc:date>2007-04-30T08:06:14--01:00</dc:date>
		<dc:subject>Quad 11L damage</dc:subject>
		</item>
	
	
</rdf:RDF>
